There is one thing that really striked me after reading HPMOR, it’s a certain pattern of events that repeats many times.
1) Harry gets into grave trouble due to his self-assurance and indiscretion
2) The author saves Harry using deus ex machina
And this makes me wonder—was Harry intentionally shown as an anti-example of rationality, or it just happened this way?
[Question] [HPMOR] Harry—example or anti-example?
There is one thing that really striked me after reading HPMOR, it’s a certain pattern of events that repeats many times.
1) Harry gets into grave trouble due to his self-assurance and indiscretion
2) The author saves Harry using deus ex machina
And this makes me wonder—was Harry intentionally shown as an anti-example of rationality, or it just happened this way?