Probability+utility theory might be recognized as important on its own, so there might not be a big difference between including it in Elements and publishing it as its own volume.
I like the idea of editing the Koran. It spread through conquest earlier in its life than the Bible, so perhaps it’s text isn’t as vital to its success as the Bible’s which had to spread organically more before it was spread by force.
There’s also the issue of great filters: if the great filter is in our recent past, then anything we change would be net negative, and we would be better off not going back far at all.
Probability+utility theory might be recognized as important on its own, so there might not be a big difference between including it in Elements and publishing it as its own volume.
I like the idea of editing the Koran. It spread through conquest earlier in its life than the Bible, so perhaps it’s text isn’t as vital to its success as the Bible’s which had to spread organically more before it was spread by force.
There’s also the issue of great filters: if the great filter is in our recent past, then anything we change would be net negative, and we would be better off not going back far at all.