None of that is relevant to the ways in which physics impacts ethics. Deterministic causality impacts fee choice, and through that, praise, blame and the moral wort of actions. MWI is also deterministic, and impacts the ability to refrain from an action: if there was ever a non zero probability of you murdering someone, there is a, wield where you did.
Which is why, again, I’m suggesting Yudkowsky’s writings describing compatibilism. There is a sense in which objective morality exists, and a sense in which it doesn’t; there is similarly a sense in which the world is deterministic and a sense in which we have free will, and the appearance of conflict has to do with our intuitions being too vague and needing to be sharpened and defined better.
None of that is relevant to the ways in which physics impacts ethics. Deterministic causality impacts fee choice, and through that, praise, blame and the moral wort of actions. MWI is also deterministic, and impacts the ability to refrain from an action: if there was ever a non zero probability of you murdering someone, there is a, wield where you did.
Which is why, again, I’m suggesting Yudkowsky’s writings describing compatibilism. There is a sense in which objective morality exists, and a sense in which it doesn’t; there is similarly a sense in which the world is deterministic and a sense in which we have free will, and the appearance of conflict has to do with our intuitions being too vague and needing to be sharpened and defined better.