If I program a simulation of the SBP and run it under illusionist principles, aren’t the simulated Halfers going to inevitably win on average? After all, it’s a fair coin.
Can you explain what you mean by “underdetermined” in this context? How is there any ambiguity in resolving the payouts if the game is run as a third person simulation?
So you’d say that it’s coherent to be an illusionist who rejects the Halfer position in the SBP?
Sure. Also coherent to be an illusionist who accepts the Halfer position in the SBP. It’s an underdetermined problem.
If I program a simulation of the SBP and run it under illusionist principles, aren’t the simulated Halfers going to inevitably win on average? After all, it’s a fair coin.
It depends upon how you score it, which is why both the original problem and various decision-problem variants are underdetermined.
Can you explain what you mean by “underdetermined” in this context? How is there any ambiguity in resolving the payouts if the game is run as a third person simulation?