In my experience after the first few introductory emails, opening remarks, formalities, etc., are dropped as the introductions have already been made. Unless the opposite party is vastly more senior or higher rank, then perhaps the same style is retained, especially in more hierarchical organizations.
For a place like Lightcone, if someone was still writing their 20th email to the same person like the above, I would seriously question their sanity.
It’s possible, even after all the paraphernalia is removed, that forming complete sentences increase the word count significantly, if the normal practice otherwise is to use slang and/or abbreviations everywhere.
Yet for that to 2x, or more, the total length seems really astonishing. What kind of Slack conversations are typical? Can you provide a real world example?
To look at it another way, I don’t see how I could cut the above comment in half while retaining all the same meanings, there just aren’t that many commonly known abbreviations or slang words.
To look at it another way, I don’t see how I could cut the above comment in half while retaining all the same meanings, there just aren’t that many commonly known abbreviations or slang words.
“Hey M.Y.Zou, email tends to be more formal, verbose and slow. Discord and chat feel more like quick informal chatting.”
(no, this doesn’t cover all the exact same nuances as the previous sentence, but part of the point is that those nuances weren’t really necessary. Slack also tends to pull extra nuance out of you if it’s actually important, but only when it’s actually important)
I think MYZ was referring to his comment rather than Daphne’s and saying that that one couldn’t be halved in length without substantial loss. (But I disagree. “Your first email might be formal but later ones between ~equals usually aren’t. I bet no one at Lightcone is writing a lot of emails like the one above. Abbreviation and slang surely don’t give a 2x shortening—do you have an example?” That’s from 826 bytes to 237 bytes. My condensation is fairly extreme and loses nuances but is still full sentences with complete words and the reduction is substantially more than 2x.)
In my experience after the first few introductory emails, opening remarks, formalities, etc., are dropped as the introductions have already been made. Unless the opposite party is vastly more senior or higher rank, then perhaps the same style is retained, especially in more hierarchical organizations.
For a place like Lightcone, if someone was still writing their 20th email to the same person like the above, I would seriously question their sanity.
It’s possible, even after all the paraphernalia is removed, that forming complete sentences increase the word count significantly, if the normal practice otherwise is to use slang and/or abbreviations everywhere.
Yet for that to 2x, or more, the total length seems really astonishing. What kind of Slack conversations are typical? Can you provide a real world example?
To look at it another way, I don’t see how I could cut the above comment in half while retaining all the same meanings, there just aren’t that many commonly known abbreviations or slang words.
“Hey M.Y.Zou, email tends to be more formal, verbose and slow. Discord and chat feel more like quick informal chatting.”
(no, this doesn’t cover all the exact same nuances as the previous sentence, but part of the point is that those nuances weren’t really necessary. Slack also tends to pull extra nuance out of you if it’s actually important, but only when it’s actually important)
I think MYZ was referring to his comment rather than Daphne’s and saying that that one couldn’t be halved in length without substantial loss. (But I disagree. “Your first email might be formal but later ones between ~equals usually aren’t. I bet no one at Lightcone is writing a lot of emails like the one above. Abbreviation and slang surely don’t give a 2x shortening—do you have an example?” That’s from 826 bytes to 237 bytes. My condensation is fairly extreme and loses nuances but is still full sentences with complete words and the reduction is substantially more than 2x.)