We seem to have very different goals, which is fine. But, out of curiosity—why do you wish to prevent the existence of domesticated animals? Is it a terminal goal, or is it in service of something else?
I’m in favor of Euthanasia. I’m also in favor of not having kids if you know you have some kind of genetic problem. I am against Euthanasia without consent, but that’s more for political reasons. People don’t take it well if you decide if their life is worth living, and the associated problems are not worth the benefit of them not living in pain. Is there any particular example you have in mind?
We seem to have very different goals, which is fine. But, out of curiosity—why do you wish to prevent the existence of domesticated animals? Is it a terminal goal, or is it in service of something else?
I want to prevent the suffering of domesticated animals. The simplest way is to prevent their existence.
Any reason this argument won’t apply to certain subsets of humans?
I’m in favor of Euthanasia. I’m also in favor of not having kids if you know you have some kind of genetic problem. I am against Euthanasia without consent, but that’s more for political reasons. People don’t take it well if you decide if their life is worth living, and the associated problems are not worth the benefit of them not living in pain. Is there any particular example you have in mind?
“Euthanasia without consent”—is that what is more commonly known as “murder”?
Yes, I would imagine they don’t...