There are two ways to see it. One is to say that the NATO made a strategic mistake. They should have funded resistance organizations but they end up bombing Serbia which was bad for moral.
The other would be to say that NATO intervention is generally a problem. If he argues that, then how does he think those three can work in practice? Does he say anything about that?
Srđa Popović′s book is built around the idea that peoples can and should decide their own fate. He doesn’t have much to say about NATO except that he didn’t like it when NATO bombing his country because it killed people and increased support for the regime.
Funding resistance organizations has an entirely separate problem where it makes the resistance groups look like foreign stooges. Srđa Popović trains resistance organizations worldwide. After his group finishes training people, they shift to a deliberately hands-off approach because they want local movements to be genuinely local.
There are two ways to see it. One is to say that the NATO made a strategic mistake. They should have funded resistance organizations but they end up bombing Serbia which was bad for moral.
The other would be to say that NATO intervention is generally a problem. If he argues that, then how does he think those three can work in practice? Does he say anything about that?
Srđa Popović′s book is built around the idea that peoples can and should decide their own fate. He doesn’t have much to say about NATO except that he didn’t like it when NATO bombing his country because it killed people and increased support for the regime.
Funding resistance organizations has an entirely separate problem where it makes the resistance groups look like foreign stooges. Srđa Popović trains resistance organizations worldwide. After his group finishes training people, they shift to a deliberately hands-off approach because they want local movements to be genuinely local.