If we publish a new article, as my boss wanted, I fear some people will still find the first paper and not the second one, will keep quoting it, and, god forbid, use that published method.
Can you clarify this for me? Why would a new article make it more likely that people would find the first paper compared to the current situation wherein the only paper they could find is the first paper?
Can you clarify this for me? Why would a new article make it more likely that people would find the first paper compared to the current situation wherein the only paper they could find is the first paper?
New separate article is certainly better than nothing.
Erratum or retraction are, for my conscience, better than a new separate article.
I wonder if there are other ways people deal with this.
Why not both? Refer to the new paper in the errata.