“The Guy Responsible for Shit” as a role is conceptual and abstract. If you’re trying to program yourself, a complete person with full sensory detail would be more motivating. Picture an actual person, maybe yourself, as Responsible Guy, a superhero with a full back story and life and personality.
A role is a step more concrete than a verbal commandment, and better thereby. But an actual character is more concrete still.
I’d recommend a persona over a role. Make it a person to inhabit, instead of an idea to correspond to.
can you explain? Sounds interesting.
“The Guy Responsible for Shit” as a role is conceptual and abstract. If you’re trying to program yourself, a complete person with full sensory detail would be more motivating. Picture an actual person, maybe yourself, as Responsible Guy, a superhero with a full back story and life and personality.
A role is a step more concrete than a verbal commandment, and better thereby. But an actual character is more concrete still.