My experience reading the Quran (I’ve only read a few percent so far) has been comparable to my experience reading the Bible. Both are rather poetic, in different ways, but the content is only occasionally useful. I genuinely enjoyed reading the Analects and the Tao Te Ching, however, as the wisdom seemed more densely concentrated and more applicable.
Haven’t read either of these, and what you are saying fits with my previous expectations. I were going to say the bible first but I figured many might have already read it.
Remember the point of the exercise is not to read somehting that’s good and you’ve planed to read sometime. It’s to read somehting you think is horrible and people will look funny at you for reading… but that you are wrong about.
This is obviously impossible to do on purpose in any straightforward way, but I have this feeling that the rationalist masters have a few clever tricks to get around that paradox...
My experience reading the Quran (I’ve only read a few percent so far) has been comparable to my experience reading the Bible. Both are rather poetic, in different ways, but the content is only occasionally useful. I genuinely enjoyed reading the Analects and the Tao Te Ching, however, as the wisdom seemed more densely concentrated and more applicable.
Haven’t read either of these, and what you are saying fits with my previous expectations. I were going to say the bible first but I figured many might have already read it.
Remember the point of the exercise is not to read somehting that’s good and you’ve planed to read sometime. It’s to read somehting you think is horrible and people will look funny at you for reading… but that you are wrong about.
This is obviously impossible to do on purpose in any straightforward way, but I have this feeling that the rationalist masters have a few clever tricks to get around that paradox...