Youre subsuming the epistemic problem of induction under the ontologcal problem of induction, but you haven’t offered a solution to the ontologcal problem of induction.
Edit:
How do you know that the world is stable? Effect has followed cause in the past, but stability means that it will also do so in the future..but to think that it will do so in the future because it has done so in the past is inductive reasoning.
Youre subsuming the epistemic problem of induction under the ontologcal problem of induction, but you haven’t offered a solution to the ontologcal problem of induction.
Edit:
How do you know that the world is stable? Effect has followed cause in the past, but stability means that it will also do so in the future..but to think that it will do so in the future because it has done so in the past is inductive reasoning.