Most of Dawkins’ output predates the extreme rationality movement. Few scientists actually study rational thought—it seems as though the machine intelligence geeks and some of their psycholgist friends have gone some way beyond what is needed for everyday science.
Again, it’s not just the fact that he does science; it’s the way he does science.
Having skill as a rationalist is distinct from specializing in rationality as one’s area of research. Dawkins’ writings aren’t on rational thought (for the most part); they’re examples of rational thought.
Most of Dawkins’ output predates the extreme rationality movement. Few scientists actually study rational thought—it seems as though the machine intelligence geeks and some of their psycholgist friends have gone some way beyond what is needed for everyday science.
Again, it’s not just the fact that he does science; it’s the way he does science.
Having skill as a rationalist is distinct from specializing in rationality as one’s area of research. Dawkins’ writings aren’t on rational thought (for the most part); they’re examples of rational thought.