Meta: How come there have been so many posts recently by the generic Username account? More people wanting to preserve anonymity, or just one person who can’t be bothered to make an account / own up to most of what they say?
The similar formatting of the comments suggests that in this thread it’s mostly one person with a lot of links to share.
Personally, I just haven’t been bothered to make an account, and have been using the username account exclusively for about 5 years. I’d estimate 30-50% of all the posts on the account were made by me over this timeframe, though writing style suggests to me that a good number of people have used it as a one-shot throwaway, and several people have used it many times.
just one person who can’t be bothered to make an account
My dominant hypothesis is at least three people who couldn’t be bothered to make accounts, and that this has further normalized the usage of Username as a generic lurker account.
I think its a reasonable solution to people not wanting to make an account or also the occasional anonymous post. I have used it once or twice to make separate comments.
But I should add that you can see a list of your nearest meetups if you set your location on your own account.
Edit: holy hell the person who posted all the OT comments here is really annoying and should make an account and stop link-dropping. If the account is being abused that bad we should shut it down and I would change my vote in the poll.
From the upvote to downvote ratio it looks like more members think the posts by Username in the open thread are worthwhile—at the time of writing they are mostly among the higher top-level comments on this week’s open thread, and several have sparked at least a bit of subsequent discussion in the form of follow up comments.
True, they’re only links (with quoted text) but this doesn’t particularly strike me as abuse of the Username account.
Oh, I wasn’t suggesting that; I was just hoping that whoever has been exclusively posting from that account can take a hint and consider using LW the typical way. It’s confusing to see so many posts at once by that account and not know whether there’s one person or several using it.
All votes are done by real accounts. There a checkbox under a poll that marks whether your vote is annonymous or isn’t by default it’s toggled for annonymous votes.
Meta: How come there have been so many posts recently by the generic Username account? More people wanting to preserve anonymity, or just one person who can’t be bothered to make an account / own up to most of what they say?
The similar formatting of the comments suggests that in this thread it’s mostly one person with a lot of links to share.
Personally, I just haven’t been bothered to make an account, and have been using the username account exclusively for about 5 years. I’d estimate 30-50% of all the posts on the account were made by me over this timeframe, though writing style suggests to me that a good number of people have used it as a one-shot throwaway, and several people have used it many times.
My dominant hypothesis is at least three people who couldn’t be bothered to make accounts, and that this has further normalized the usage of Username as a generic lurker account.
I think its a reasonable solution to people not wanting to make an account or also the occasional anonymous post. I have used it once or twice to make separate comments.
But I should add that you can see a list of your nearest meetups if you set your location on your own account.
Edit: holy hell the person who posted all the OT comments here is really annoying and should make an account and stop link-dropping. If the account is being abused that bad we should shut it down and I would change my vote in the poll.
From the upvote to downvote ratio it looks like more members think the posts by Username in the open thread are worthwhile—at the time of writing they are mostly among the higher top-level comments on this week’s open thread, and several have sparked at least a bit of subsequent discussion in the form of follow up comments.
True, they’re only links (with quoted text) but this doesn’t particularly strike me as abuse of the Username account.
I am suspicious of the link-drop attitude to posting anywhere. Even if it looks to have value added this time.
That leaves the question of whether that’s okay or whether we should simply disable the account.
[pollid:1013]
Oh, I wasn’t suggesting that; I was just hoping that whoever has been exclusively posting from that account can take a hint and consider using LW the typical way. It’s confusing to see so many posts at once by that account and not know whether there’s one person or several using it.
It’s interesting looking at the raw data breakdown of non -anonymous versus anonymous votes.
that’s creepy; also if you take away all the anonymous votes then there are very few votes (5). That might be normal for polls here. Hard to tell.
Also to note; I voted with my account here and it does not appear in the raw poll data. I don’t know why.
Anonymous voting is the default, and I always leave it on.
I’d prefer to see accountability be a default, with anonymity whenever desired.
All votes are done by real accounts. There a checkbox under a poll that marks whether your vote is annonymous or isn’t by default it’s toggled for annonymous votes.