This reminds me of the way I hear they do state censorship in China. The censoring agencies don’t actually give out any specific guidelines on what is allowed and what isn’t, instead just clamping down on cases they do consider to be over the line. As a consequence, everyone self-censors more than they might with specific guidelines: with the guidelines, you could always try to twist their letter to violate their spirit. Instead, people are constantly unsure of just exactly what will get you in trouble, so they err on the side of caution.
While I strongly oppose state censorship, I can’t help but admire the genius in the system.
Also, unlike Saudi Arabia, they don’t make many efforts to block pornography. As a result, the average Chinese teen is less likely to know how to access blocked sites than the average Saudi teen is (or so I read; I’m not aware of any study on that).
Or section 28 , which didn’t forbid the discussion of homosexuality in the classroom, only its promotion....but since promotion wasn’t defined, schools erred on the side of not mentioning it.
Depressing. This would mean that most informal norms of censorship are much more resilient and effective than most formal laws censoring material.
Arguably this makes them much harder to dislodge than even the intentionally vague Chinese law. Since I guess you can’t really be prosecuted under it by pointing out there is a censorship law right?
This reminds me of the way I hear they do state censorship in China. The censoring agencies don’t actually give out any specific guidelines on what is allowed and what isn’t, instead just clamping down on cases they do consider to be over the line. As a consequence, everyone self-censors more than they might with specific guidelines: with the guidelines, you could always try to twist their letter to violate their spirit. Instead, people are constantly unsure of just exactly what will get you in trouble, so they err on the side of caution.
While I strongly oppose state censorship, I can’t help but admire the genius in the system.
Also, unlike Saudi Arabia, they don’t make many efforts to block pornography. As a result, the average Chinese teen is less likely to know how to access blocked sites than the average Saudi teen is (or so I read; I’m not aware of any study on that).
Or section 28 , which didn’t forbid the discussion of homosexuality in the classroom, only its promotion....but since promotion wasn’t defined, schools erred on the side of not mentioning it.
Depressing. This would mean that most informal norms of censorship are much more resilient and effective than most formal laws censoring material.
Arguably this makes them much harder to dislodge than even the intentionally vague Chinese law. Since I guess you can’t really be prosecuted under it by pointing out there is a censorship law right?