You won’t be able to. If I should quote the relevant passages from the earliest who proposed this idea, I suspect my post would not merely be downvoted, but deleted.
Could one not say that, in the fortuitous combinations of the productions of nature, as there must be some characterized by a certain relation of fitness which are able to subsist, it is not to be wondered at that this fitness is present in all the species that are currently in existence? Chance, one would say, produced an innumerable multitude of individuals; a small number found themselves constructed in such a manner that the parts of the animal were able to satisfy its needs; in another infinitely greater number, there was neither fitness nor order: all of these latter have perished. Animals lacking a mouth could not live; others lacking reproductive organs could not perpetuate themselves… The species we see today are but the smallest part of what blind destiny has produced...
Ones where you forget you are in an international forum and insist on discussing parochial American political issues?
No, that’s not it. The problem is being in a rational* forum and insisting on discussing political issues (tout court).
(...and just being a troll.)
* word chosen because it rhymes with “international”, allowing a rhetorical parallelism with the wording of the parent. Comments on how the word is too self-congratulatory are not invited.
Ones where you forget you are in an international forum and insist on discussing parochial American political issues?
Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis in 1745
Could one not say that, in the fortuitous combinations of the productions of nature, as there must be some characterized by a certain relation of fitness which are able to subsist, it is not to be wondered at that this fitness is present in all the species that are currently in existence? Chance, one would say, produced an innumerable multitude of individuals; a small number found themselves constructed in such a manner that the parts of the animal were able to satisfy its needs; in another infinitely greater number, there was neither fitness nor order: all of these latter have perished. Animals lacking a mouth could not live; others lacking reproductive organs could not perpetuate themselves… The species we see today are but the smallest part of what blind destiny has produced...
from Vénus Physique
awaiting deletion :P
No, that’s not it. The problem is being in a rational* forum and insisting on discussing political issues (tout court).
(...and just being a troll.)
* word chosen because it rhymes with “international”, allowing a rhetorical parallelism with the wording of the parent. Comments on how the word is too self-congratulatory are not invited.
I think the main problem was writing like a fanatical crackpot.