I don’t know if this model is working at all, but I’m looking for something like what this sounds—a detailed low-level explanation that will ideally help me see the presence or absence of IQ in every individual thought/idea.
Why do you expect this to be possible? Even the most heavily g-loaded tasks like matrix tests still have substantial non-g variance to them. Let’s remember what IQ is: a statistical tendency found by factor analysis of performance on multiple unrelated tasks. Expecting to find ‘the presence or absence of IQ’ makes it sound like you’re reifying IQ as a specific plausible neurological capability akin to long-term memory or working memory.
That doesn’t change anything—then I want to know what constitutes pattern recognition, working memory (I know that some of it comes from executive functions—so it’s not as simple as it looks like), spatial. Then I want to look at how each of them looks like in someone’s reasoning. Plus maybe some of the not so highly g-loaded tasks.
Why do you expect this to be possible? Even the most heavily g-loaded tasks like matrix tests still have substantial non-g variance to them. Let’s remember what IQ is: a statistical tendency found by factor analysis of performance on multiple unrelated tasks. Expecting to find ‘the presence or absence of IQ’ makes it sound like you’re reifying IQ as a specific plausible neurological capability akin to long-term memory or working memory.
That doesn’t change anything—then I want to know what constitutes pattern recognition, working memory (I know that some of it comes from executive functions—so it’s not as simple as it looks like), spatial. Then I want to look at how each of them looks like in someone’s reasoning. Plus maybe some of the not so highly g-loaded tasks.