I haven’t paid much attention to their marketing copy, but they do have big flashy things about a bunch of stuff including interpreting science models, and everything I’ve seen from them involving a real customer was not about training on interp. Plausibly they could communicate better here though
I interpret their new intentional design post as “here’s a research direction we think could be a big deal”, not “here’s the central focus of the company”
Tom McGrath, chief scientist, confirmed that my comment is correct: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XzdDypFuffzE4WeP7/themanxloiner-s-shortform?commentId=BupJhRhsAYvKZGLKG
I haven’t paid much attention to their marketing copy, but they do have big flashy things about a bunch of stuff including interpreting science models, and everything I’ve seen from them involving a real customer was not about training on interp. Plausibly they could communicate better here though
I interpret their new intentional design post as “here’s a research direction we think could be a big deal”, not “here’s the central focus of the company”