Does the rationale of the path of least resistance conflict with the challenges of life that are required for change?
“Life provides enough problems without us making more.”
If you’re up to your neck in water, (maybe) it’s time to stop walking, and start swimming.
If you don’t have enough challenges you can make what you’re doing more difficult—or go find something better (harder) to do.
Imagine you are at the beach. If you swim out far enough, you can surf back in. If you get caught in a rip tide/rip current, the current may be too strong to fight.*
Metaphorically, just because you’re going in the direction of the current doesn’t mean you have to just stay afloat** - you can swim.
* - swim perpendicular to the beach, then go back in.
** This behavior also seems characteristic of something having gone wrong. (If this is the case, identifying and addressing the problem may be as important as trying to change tack—which is not a 1d move in the literal world.)