If I can offer some feedback on form, I also thought it was too long for what it did say, and conversely did not say some things I would have wanted it to.
For me, the gist of the article really is this:
What I really wanted out of the system, in each case, wasn’t the most valuable thing to get, or what it had to teach me. What I wanted was me, and my own beliefs, and for everything to stay the same, so that my prime directive would be met.
This is somewhat relatable. It’s intriguing! But
is it true? I’m having some doubts. If I’m taking on some endeavour, or even some experiment, my goal isn’t to be confirmed in my current identity. But could my current identity be a force that acts against that endeavour or the honest fullfilment of the experiment? Probably. Would you agree or do you see this differently?
I thought the piece was interesting.
If I can offer some feedback on form, I also thought it was too long for what it did say, and conversely did not say some things I would have wanted it to.
For me, the gist of the article really is this:
This is somewhat relatable. It’s intriguing! But
is it true? I’m having some doubts. If I’m taking on some endeavour, or even some experiment, my goal isn’t to be confirmed in my current identity. But could my current identity be a force that acts against that endeavour or the honest fullfilment of the experiment? Probably. Would you agree or do you see this differently?
Where does this come from?
What to do about it?