Uhm. Not sure how to put this, but seems like remaining silent would be a worse option...
Looking at your other articles, it seems to me like you came here with many strong opinions you want to share. You keep posting long monologues, and you get some response to them, but I suspect that there are more articles already written and waiting to be published, regardless of the feedback you might get here.
Which wouldn’t be a problem if your articles were positively accepted (i.e. upvoted) by the community… but they are not. Barely anyone votes on them, and the average feedback is negative.
I wish I could provide a more detailed feedback, but the fact is that these articles are just too long for me. Even length is not exactly the problem, it’s like… for example, this article is about medical diagnostic imaging, which is a topic I know almost nothing about, your arguments are not easy for me to verify, maybe you are right about something important, or maybe you are completely wrong… I can’t tell. Generally, if I can’t tell, I don’t vote. But I suspect that most readers here are in the same position. But then, this is not the right audience for you, and it is not the right content for this website.
If you want actual engagement with your ideas, I suggest to take it much slower. Don’t put dozen claims in a single article, because almost no one will read them all. (Ironically, you mention “gish gallop” in the same article than contains links to proteins, group delusion, lithium, gravitational waves, leukemia diagnostics, sunscreen, Triclosan, spine surgery, Gadolinium, boron, flouride, heart attack, neutrinos, Higgs particle, satellites, balloons, laser, fusion, climate, planets, and expansion of the universe.) If you focus on one thing, there is a chance you may find people who understand it and can have a debate with you. Otherwise, you are just wasting time here.
Uhm. Not sure how to put this, but seems like remaining silent would be a worse option...
Looking at your other articles, it seems to me like you came here with many strong opinions you want to share. You keep posting long monologues, and you get some response to them, but I suspect that there are more articles already written and waiting to be published, regardless of the feedback you might get here.
Which wouldn’t be a problem if your articles were positively accepted (i.e. upvoted) by the community… but they are not. Barely anyone votes on them, and the average feedback is negative.
I wish I could provide a more detailed feedback, but the fact is that these articles are just too long for me. Even length is not exactly the problem, it’s like… for example, this article is about medical diagnostic imaging, which is a topic I know almost nothing about, your arguments are not easy for me to verify, maybe you are right about something important, or maybe you are completely wrong… I can’t tell. Generally, if I can’t tell, I don’t vote. But I suspect that most readers here are in the same position. But then, this is not the right audience for you, and it is not the right content for this website.
If you want actual engagement with your ideas, I suggest to take it much slower. Don’t put dozen claims in a single article, because almost no one will read them all. (Ironically, you mention “gish gallop” in the same article than contains links to proteins, group delusion, lithium, gravitational waves, leukemia diagnostics, sunscreen, Triclosan, spine surgery, Gadolinium, boron, flouride, heart attack, neutrinos, Higgs particle, satellites, balloons, laser, fusion, climate, planets, and expansion of the universe.) If you focus on one thing, there is a chance you may find people who understand it and can have a debate with you. Otherwise, you are just wasting time here.