Part of my point with the post is that I think Double Crux is just one step in a long list of steps (i.e. the giant list of background skills necessary for it to be useful). I think it’s the next step a chain where every step is necessary.
My belief that Double Crux is getting overloaded to mean both “literally finding the double crux” and “the entire process of productive disagreement” may be a bit of a departure from it’s usual presentation.
I think your current take on it, and mine, may be fairly similar, and that these are in fact different from how it’s usually described.
Part of my point with the post is that I think Double Crux is just one step in a long list of steps (i.e. the giant list of background skills necessary for it to be useful). I think it’s the next step a chain where every step is necessary.
My belief that Double Crux is getting overloaded to mean both “literally finding the double crux” and “the entire process of productive disagreement” may be a bit of a departure from it’s usual presentation.
I think your current take on it, and mine, may be fairly similar, and that these are in fact different from how it’s usually described.