This is a little bit aside the point, but when I clicked on this link and saw “communist norm in AGI” in the title I predicted this would be some kind of low-quality post arguing about AGI development from the standpoint of a political philosophy. Then I read the post and it turns out that’s not what “communist norm” means here; it’s jargon that has specific meaning that wasn’t what I expected. My guess is others might react to the title in the same way.
So although your title is accurate, my guess is that your post will be better received if you give this term a different name that less sounds like it’s associated with a political philosophy, like maybe calling it an “openness norm”, at least initially before introducing and switching to the technical term “communist norm”, which seems to my ear a better description of what you’re talking about even if it’s not the technical term normally used.
This is a little bit aside the point, but when I clicked on this link and saw “communist norm in AGI” in the title I predicted this would be some kind of low-quality post arguing about AGI development from the standpoint of a political philosophy. Then I read the post and it turns out that’s not what “communist norm” means here; it’s jargon that has specific meaning that wasn’t what I expected. My guess is others might react to the title in the same way.
So although your title is accurate, my guess is that your post will be better received if you give this term a different name that less sounds like it’s associated with a political philosophy, like maybe calling it an “openness norm”, at least initially before introducing and switching to the technical term “communist norm”, which seems to my ear a better description of what you’re talking about even if it’s not the technical term normally used.
Thanks, that’s helpful. Edited.
-