Yes, they do. Gamergate’s main complaint is the prevalence of unethical practices in journalism related to gaming. Since Arthur Chu is a journalist of dubious ethics, his actions are in fact relevant.
Also look at the evidence for GamerGate’s terribleness. Much of it comes from people who run in the same circles as Arthur Chu, thus Arthur Chu’s behavior is relevant to how much we should trust their claims.
Ben Cotton
I can see what you’re getting at, but I don’t think the rationality content here is enough to justify importing a notoriously divisive topic.
Yes, they do. Gamergate’s main complaint is the prevalence of unethical practices in journalism related to gaming. Since Arthur Chu is a journalist of dubious ethics, his actions are in fact relevant.
Also look at the evidence for GamerGate’s terribleness. Much of it comes from people who run in the same circles as Arthur Chu, thus Arthur Chu’s behavior is relevant to how much we should trust their claims.