He quickly appears to conclude that he cannot really discuss any issues with EY because they don’t even share the same premises.
So they should establish what premises they DO share, and from that base, determine why they hold the different beliefs that they do.
I find it unlikely that they don’t share any premises at all. Their ability to communicate anything, albeit strictly limited, indicates that’s there’s common ground of a sort.
I find it unlikely that they don’t share any premises at all. Their ability to communicate anything, albeit strictly limited, indicates that’s there’s common ground of a sort.