“Coefficient Giving sounds bad while OpenPhil sounded cool and snappy.”—OpenPhil just sounds better because it’s shorter. I imagine that instead of saying the full name, Coefficient Giving will soon acquire some similar sort of nickname—probably people will just say “Coefficient”, which sounds kinda cool IMO. I could also picture people writing “Coeff” as shorthand, although it would be weird to try and say “Coeff” out loud.
I could also get used to saying “cGive” pronounced similar to “sea Give” which has nice connotations spoken aloud and has c as coefficient right in the written version. But I agree that “Coefficient” has a good sound compared to which “cGive” seems more generic
“Coefficient Giving sounds bad while OpenPhil sounded cool and snappy.”—OpenPhil just sounds better because it’s shorter. I imagine that instead of saying the full name, Coefficient Giving will soon acquire some similar sort of nickname—probably people will just say “Coefficient”, which sounds kinda cool IMO. I could also picture people writing “Coeff” as shorthand, although it would be weird to try and say “Coeff” out loud.
I could also get used to saying “cGive” pronounced similar to “sea Give” which has nice connotations spoken aloud and has c as coefficient right in the written version. But I agree that “Coefficient” has a good sound compared to which “cGive” seems more generic