How is that an answer? It seems like he’s mostly contesting my premises “that AI-Xrisk is significant (e.g. roughly >10%), and timelines are not long (e.g. >50% ASI in <100years)”
My bad, just read the title.
Nice! owning up to it; I like it! :D
How is that an answer? It seems like he’s mostly contesting my premises “that AI-Xrisk is significant (e.g. roughly >10%), and timelines are not long (e.g. >50% ASI in <100years)”
My bad, just read the title.
Nice! owning up to it; I like it! :D