I’m excited to find your comment, osten, that reads as a pretty insightful view to me.
Let me restate what I understood your light( and welcome) critique to be: I have put “human civilization” out as an actor which lasted/endured a long time which heuristically suggests it has high resilience and robustness properties and thus deserves respect and holding the control. Here you say it did not endure much as a single structure to consider/test with Lindy, as it got changed significantly and many times, thus we maybe should split it like “feudal civilization”, “democratic civilization”, etc.
The other interpretation I see is that yeah, it is one structure, but ASI will keep the structure, but lead (in) it. I enjoy that argument, but it would not fully work unless AIs get the status of a physical person, but would somewhat work when it can gather human proxies whenever possible.
I’m excited to find your comment, osten, that reads as a pretty insightful view to me.
Let me restate what I understood your light( and welcome) critique to be: I have put “human civilization” out as an actor which lasted/endured a long time which heuristically suggests it has high resilience and robustness properties and thus deserves respect and holding the control. Here you say it did not endure much as a single structure to consider/test with Lindy, as it got changed significantly and many times, thus we maybe should split it like “feudal civilization”, “democratic civilization”, etc.
The other interpretation I see is that yeah, it is one structure, but ASI will keep the structure, but lead (in) it. I enjoy that argument, but it would not fully work unless AIs get the status of a physical person, but would somewhat work when it can gather human proxies whenever possible.