I guess my approach is slightly different to the approach discussed in that article.
I’m not entirely certain about this, but In regards to non-partisanship, is there perhaps some sort of screening process/background check that can be carried out to identify individuals who are non-partisan (for joining the proctoring committee)? Something like the Harvard Implicit Bias test but for motivated reasoning? Asking people to quickly make decisions in situations susceptible to motivated reasoning? This test has been criticized but also has some research in support so it may be the best option. Could a blockchain system eliminate bias within the proctoring committee?
Could a blockchain system eliminate bias within the proctoring committee?
How?
(I understand how the blockchain can be used for currency*, or perhaps like a decentralized google docs**, but “eliminating bias” I don’t get. (Though that would be really amazing.)
*blockchain keeps track of how much money there is
blockchain keeps track of who has been given permission to view documents
I guess my approach is slightly different to the approach discussed in that article.
I’m not entirely certain about this, but In regards to non-partisanship, is there perhaps some sort of screening process/background check that can be carried out to identify individuals who are non-partisan (for joining the proctoring committee)? Something like the Harvard Implicit Bias test but for motivated reasoning? Asking people to quickly make decisions in situations susceptible to motivated reasoning? This test has been criticized but also has some research in support so it may be the best option. Could a blockchain system eliminate bias within the proctoring committee?
How?
(I understand how the blockchain can be used for currency*, or perhaps like a decentralized google docs**, but “eliminating bias” I don’t get. (Though that would be really amazing.)
*blockchain keeps track of how much money there is
blockchain keeps track of who has been given permission to view documents
)