I hope that this doesn’t come off as an appeal to authority, but hasn’t the Supreme Court been effective in catching most (or at least a fair amount) of the misinterpretations of the US Constitution and breaches of power? To be fair I am not legal expert and that is a mere assumption so it could be very wrong. But if it is not, then what is to say that although this group may not be exactly non-partisan, just like the Supreme Court they will be non-partisan enough to catch most breaches?
Or is the flaw here assuming that they will be as impartial as the Supreme Court justices?
I don’t have a strong opinion on how good a job the Supreme Court has done, but it does pretty clearly vote along party lines on obviously-party-line issues.
I hope that this doesn’t come off as an appeal to authority, but hasn’t the Supreme Court been effective in catching most (or at least a fair amount) of the misinterpretations of the US Constitution and breaches of power? To be fair I am not legal expert and that is a mere assumption so it could be very wrong. But if it is not, then what is to say that although this group may not be exactly non-partisan, just like the Supreme Court they will be non-partisan enough to catch most breaches?
Or is the flaw here assuming that they will be as impartial as the Supreme Court justices?
I don’t have a strong opinion on how good a job the Supreme Court has done, but it does pretty clearly vote along party lines on obviously-party-line issues.