I still think there’s too much confusion between ethics-for-AI and ethics-for-humans discussions here. There’s no particular reason that a conceptual apparatus suited for the former discussion should also be suited for the latter discussion.
Yep. Particularly as humans are observably not human-friendly. (Even to the extent of preserving human notions of value—plenty of humans go dangerously nuts.)
I still think there’s too much confusion between ethics-for-AI and ethics-for-humans discussions here. There’s no particular reason that a conceptual apparatus suited for the former discussion should also be suited for the latter discussion.
Yep. Particularly as humans are observably not human-friendly. (Even to the extent of preserving human notions of value—plenty of humans go dangerously nuts.)