I didn’t go down any road for confirmation. I put your single testimony in a more realistic perspective. Not believing one person who seems to have a highly emotional agenda isn’t ‘cultish’, it’s just practical.
I think you grossly overestimate how much emotional agenda can disagreement with counterfactual people produce.
This doesn’t make sense as a reply to the context. I’m not sure it makes any sense as a matter of English grammar either.
This doesn’t make sense as a reply to the context. I’m not sure it makes any sense as a matter of English grammar either.