What I am certain of is that your provided argument does not support, or even strongly imply your stated thesis.
I know this. I am not making argument here (or actually, trying not to). I’m stating my opinion, primarily on presentation of the argument. If you want argument, you can e.g. see what Hansen has to say about foom. It is, deliberately this way. I am not some messiah hell bent on rescuing you from some wrongness (that would be crazy).
In that case, you might want to consider rewriting your post. Right now, the crazy messiah vibe is coming through very strongly. Either back it up and stop wasting our time, or rewrite it to assert less social dominance. If you do the latter without the former, people get cranky.
I’m mainstream, you guys are fringe, do you understand? I am informing you that you are not only not convincing, but look like complete clowns who don’t know big O from a letter of alphabet. I know you want to do better than this. And I know some of people here have technical knowledge.
I know this. I am not making argument here (or actually, trying not to). I’m stating my opinion, primarily on presentation of the argument. If you want argument, you can e.g. see what Hansen has to say about foom. It is, deliberately this way. I am not some messiah hell bent on rescuing you from some wrongness (that would be crazy).
In that case, you might want to consider rewriting your post. Right now, the crazy messiah vibe is coming through very strongly. Either back it up and stop wasting our time, or rewrite it to assert less social dominance. If you do the latter without the former, people get cranky.
I’m mainstream, you guys are fringe, do you understand? I am informing you that you are not only not convincing, but look like complete clowns who don’t know big O from a letter of alphabet. I know you want to do better than this. And I know some of people here have technical knowledge.
Yes, this is what is meant by “assert social dominance”. The suggestion was to do less of it, though, not more.