The phrase that once came into my mind to describe this requirement, is that a mind must be created already in motion. There is no argument so compelling that it will give dynamics to a static thing. There is no computer program so persuasive that you can run it on a rock.
To add to my previous comment, I think there’s a more rigorous way to express this point. (The “motion” analogy seems pretty vague.)
A non-universal Turing machine can’t simulate a universal Turing machine. (If it could, it would be universal after all—a contradiction.) In other words, there are computers that can self-program and those that can’t, and no amount of programming can change the latter into the former.
A non-universal Turing machine can’t simulate a universal Turing machine. (If it could, it would be universal after all—a contradiction.) In other words, there are computers that can self-program and those that can’t, and no amount of programming can change the latter into the former.
Cheers, Ari