Feels obvious until it gets to using counterfactuals for possible debiasing and the dangers in the technique — this was quite interesting for me.
Also interesting are the “five logically defensible strategies”.
Quibble:
If two people draw different conclusions from the same information, then at least one of them is wrong.
But different conclusions can be compatible?
Feels obvious until it gets to using counterfactuals for possible debiasing and the dangers in the technique — this was quite interesting for me.
Also interesting are the “five logically defensible strategies”.
Quibble:
But different conclusions can be compatible?