Even when E ideas are extremely similar to some SEP article, he assumes: ” If the words are not the same, then there are differences”. This sentiment converge to point 2.
I suppose has to do with possible linguistic traps. If we use terms who has a focal points as a premisse, probably these words come with hidden inferences associated to specific groups. Avoiding academic parlance whenever possible is good, but obvious improvements could be done in the writings.
Even when E ideas are extremely similar to some SEP article, he assumes: ” If the words are not the same, then there are differences”. This sentiment converge to point 2.
I suppose has to do with possible linguistic traps. If we use terms who has a focal points as a premisse, probably these words come with hidden inferences associated to specific groups. Avoiding academic parlance whenever possible is good, but obvious improvements could be done in the writings.