Sure, you can be a histories-preferer, and also a consequentialist. In fact you have preferences over histories anyway, really.
Hmm… Then, in what sense can you mean the top-level comment while keeping this in mind?
I meant it in a hypothetical way. I don’t actually like state-consequentialism—trivially, human experiences are only meaningful as a section of the history of the universe.
Sure, you can be a histories-preferer, and also a consequentialist. In fact you have preferences over histories anyway, really.
Hmm… Then, in what sense can you mean the top-level comment while keeping this in mind?
I meant it in a hypothetical way. I don’t actually like state-consequentialism—trivially, human experiences are only meaningful as a section of the history of the universe.