I mean, I somewhat agree, but I think this is just a less precise way of saying what I said in the post.
Like, I’m trying to explaining how, even if we assume other peoples account of their own experience are faithful, which give us indirect access to others experience (which is different from no access), and allows us to pin down some of the structure of other people subjective experience, the mapping is still impossible to construct even in principle, because the data of the physical world doesn’t fully determine either mapping.
This is a somewhat stronger claim than the one you’re making.
I mean, I somewhat agree, but I think this is just a less precise way of saying what I said in the post.
Like, I’m trying to explaining how, even if we assume other peoples account of their own experience are faithful, which give us indirect access to others experience (which is different from no access), and allows us to pin down some of the structure of other people subjective experience, the mapping is still impossible to construct even in principle, because the data of the physical world doesn’t fully determine either mapping.
This is a somewhat stronger claim than the one you’re making.