If you have a point to make, I think it can be made more effectively than “Read this article”.
But Eugine made a point and his point was:
I don’t think treating human behavior as a simple random variable is a good model.
He then backed up his point to give context to suggest what a better model might be, i.e. one that models a human as a temporal process with habits.
But Eugine made a point and his point was:
He then backed up his point to give context to suggest what a better model might be, i.e. one that models a human as a temporal process with habits.