Huh, weird, I see it referenced a bit in academic literature but every time I try to trace it back to primary sources I fail. E.g. in Dupras and Tocheri (2007) they say
Together, the results provide more substantial support for the hypothesis that infants at Kellis were breastfed and weaned slowly until 3 years of age, which is consistent with traditional infant feeding and weaning practices documented by Soranus and Galen, two ancient Greek and Roman historians (Green, 1951; Tempkin, 1956). Both Galen and Soranus recommended that supplementary foods, such as a mixture of honey and goat milk, should be introduced at 6 months of age, with gradual cessation of weaning occurring until 3 years of age.
However, when I try to find the primary sources to back up that assertion, the closest I get is that Soranus said, in Gynecol(Temkin translation)
Yet, on the other hand, it is also bad not to change to other food when the body has already become solid-not only because the body becomes moist and therefore delicate if fed on milk for too long a time, but also because in case of sickness the milk easily turns sour. For this reason, when the body has already become firm and ready to receive more solid food, which it will scarcely do successfully before the age of six months, it is proper to feed the child also with cereal food: with crumbs of bread softened with hydromel or milk, sweet wine, or honey wine.
But when blood has been assisted, and if from any single wound, or if any single thing flows into the belly or into some of the intestines. [...] Now, as for milk, some drink it having cast in a little honey and water and a bit of salt, so that it may not curdle in the stomach. And the best milk, they say, is that of temperate animals, when it remains unmixed, to be drunk immediately
So here’s our honey-and-goat’s milk mixture—described as something to give someone who has imbalanced humors or something like that, not as something to replace breast milk.
r.e. Wikipedia:
Wikipedia is not a comprehensive store of all human knowledge. Whether it should be a comprehensive store of human knowledge is a contentious topic but descriptively it is not comprehensive.
Huh, weird, I see it referenced a bit in academic literature but every time I try to trace it back to primary sources I fail. E.g. in Dupras and Tocheri (2007) they say
However, when I try to find the primary sources to back up that assertion, the closest I get is that Soranus said, in Gynecol(Temkin translation)
but that does not mention animal milk at all, and then Galen said, in Opera Omnia vol 6 (Kuhn, chatgpt translation)
So here’s our honey-and-goat’s milk mixture—described as something to give someone who has imbalanced humors or something like that, not as something to replace breast milk.
r.e. Wikipedia: Wikipedia is not a comprehensive store of all human knowledge. Whether it should be a comprehensive store of human knowledge is a contentious topic but descriptively it is not comprehensive.