In a sense should always implies if. Can anyone point me to a “should” assertion without an implied if? If humans implicitly assume an if whenever they say should then the term is never used to propose a moral imperative but to indicate an instrumental goal.
That is a way you can translate the use of should into a convenient logical model. But it isn’t the way humans instinctively use the verbal symbol.
That is a way you can translate the use of should into a convenient logical model. But it isn’t the way humans instinctively use the verbal symbol.