@Robin: Would you agree that what we label “intelligence” is essentially acting as a constructed neural category relating a bunch of cognitive abilities that tend to strongly correlate?
If so, it shouldn’t be possible to get an exact handle on it as anything more than arbitrary weighted average of whatever cognitive abilities we chose to measure, because there’s nothing else there to get a handle on.
But, because of that real correlation between measurable abilities that “intelligence” represents, it’s still meaningful to make rough comparisons, certainly enough to say humans > chimps > mice.
@Robin: Would you agree that what we label “intelligence” is essentially acting as a constructed neural category relating a bunch of cognitive abilities that tend to strongly correlate?
If so, it shouldn’t be possible to get an exact handle on it as anything more than arbitrary weighted average of whatever cognitive abilities we chose to measure, because there’s nothing else there to get a handle on.
But, because of that real correlation between measurable abilities that “intelligence” represents, it’s still meaningful to make rough comparisons, certainly enough to say humans > chimps > mice.