Yes, but you also have to take into account that by adopting this norm, others will attempt to decive you when they have private information. In an iterated game, you effectively end up deceiving yourself indirectly.
That seems both correct and desirable to me in certain scenarios? If somebody can help me win more effectively by deceiving me, I would prefer they do that. Especially when the consequences of “not winning” are severe, as in the case of a potentially deadly pandemic.
Yes, but you also have to take into account that by adopting this norm, others will attempt to decive you when they have private information. In an iterated game, you effectively end up deceiving yourself indirectly.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/xdwbX9pFEr7Pomaxv/meta-honesty-firming-up-honesty-around-its-edge-cases (also by Eliezer) is closer to what I was actually trying to express.
That seems both correct and desirable to me in certain scenarios? If somebody can help me win more effectively by deceiving me, I would prefer they do that. Especially when the consequences of “not winning” are severe, as in the case of a potentially deadly pandemic.